Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Direct Tax

key
direct_tax
URL
/expertise/direct-tax

Back to Basics? | Relevance of ‘beneficial ownership’ questioned when availing capital gains tax benefit under India – Mauritius Tax Treaty

Submitted by indigoadmin on Fri, 05/20/2022 - 11:34

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) in a recent decision has questioned the ‘reading in’ of the condition of ‘beneficial ownership’ (as opposed to legal ownership) when determining a taxpayer’s eligibility to avail capital gains tax benefits under Article 13 of the India – Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (Treaty). 

Supreme Court gives major relief to the Revenue in tax controversy relating to reassessment notices issued under the old regime

Submitted by indigoadmin on Wed, 05/11/2022 - 17:35

In a recent order in Union of India & Ors v Ashish Agarwal (Civil Appeal No. 3005/2022) (Order), the Hon’ble Supreme Court (Supreme Court) has held that reassessment notices issued under the old reassessment regime (ie law existing prior to 1 April 2021) are deemed to have been issued under new Section 148A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (IT Act).

High Court rules on what shall be the limitation date for passing of Transfer Pricing Orders

Submitted by indigoadmin on Fri, 04/29/2022 - 19:55

In a recent judgement in DCIT v Pfizer Healthcare India Private Limited (Writ Appeal No. 1148, 1149/2021) (Judgement), a division bench of the Hon’ble Madras High Court (High Court) has upheld single judge bench order which quashed the transfer pricing order (TP Order) pertaining to assessment year (AY) 2016-17 on the ground that it was ‘barred by limitation’ by one day. The High Court ruled that the TP Order was required to be passed on or before 31 October 2019.

High Court affirms real income theory, rules that the consideration for share sale reduced from the escrow account cannot be subject to capital gain tax

Submitted by indigoadmin on Mon, 04/18/2022 - 16:32

The Hon’ble High Court at Bombay (High Court) in the case of Dinesh Vazirani (Taxpayer) [Writ Petition No. 2475 of 2015], has held that the consideration for sale of shares by a seller (Taxpayer) which has been deposited in an escrow account but withdrawn by the purchaser towards the liabilities contemplated under the share purchase agreement (SPA), cannot be taxed in the hands of the Taxpayer.

Raghav Kumar Bajaj

Submitted by indigoadmin on Thu, 04/07/2022 - 08:00

Raghav Kumar Bajaj is a Partner in the Direct Tax practice group in the Mumbai office. He has worked on several contentious and high-stake matters and has also advised on matters involving corporate and commercial laws.

Hiten Kotak

Submitted by indigoadmin on Wed, 04/06/2022 - 19:19

Hiten Kotak is an Executive Director in the Transaction Tax, Private Client, and Corporate Restructuring practice groups in the Mumbai office. Before joining the Firm, Hiten was leading the Mergers & Acquisition Tax practice at Price Waterhouse & Co. LLP (PwC), Mumbai.